Numerical study of soil dynamic compaction using ABAQUS model

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Master of science of coastals, ports and marine Engineering Khorramshahr University of Marine Science and Technology

2 استادیار، دانشکده مهندسی دریا دانشگاه علوم و فنون دریایی، خرمشهر، ایران.

Abstract

One of the most important methods of soil compaction is dynamic compaction, which is one of the oldest and economical methods of soil improvement up to great depths. This method is applied due to its many benefits, including its economic procedure to correct many kinds of soil. One of the most important issues that affect soil improvement methods is being economic. The three main methods of using piles, chemical modification, use of Menard density and vibrating tools are used for soil compaction at the time of presentation of an improvement project. The Menard method due to its much lower cost is more widely used than other methods. Considering the importance of the economy factor in the country's development projects, the need for 3D simulation and the ability of ABAQUS software to deliver the results of this research to a numerical model that can be used in civil engineering projects is becoming more important. The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the numerical modeling of dynamic compaction using finite element method and using ABAQUS software to improve the foundation by changing to height and weight of the compactor through Menard method for three cities of Ahvaz, Abadan, and Mahshahr. The results showed that the increase in the height of the fall resulted in an increase in the depth of the impact for all three categories with different weights of compactor. In addition, the depth difference was less affected in the high weights, which shows that the only weight increase of the compactor cannot be a factor in increasing the effect of soil compaction.

Lee, F. H., and Gu, Q. (2004). Method for estimating dynamic compaction effect on sand. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 130(2), 139-152.

Vardhanabhuti, B., and Mesri, G. (2007). Coefficient of earth pressure at rest for sands subjected to vibration. Canadian geotechnical journal, 44(10), 1242-1263.

Chow,Y.K., Yong, D. M., Yong, K. Y., Lee, S. L. (1990). “Monitoring of dynamic compaction by deceleration measurements”, Computers and Geotechnics, Vol.90, No.3, PP.189-209.

Pan, J. L., and Selby, A. R. (2002). Simulation of dynamic compaction of loose granular soils. Advances in engineering software, 33(7), 631-640.

Martin, G. R., Nashed, R., Shenthan, T., Kanagalingam, T., and Ecemis, N. (2006). Liquefaction Remediation in Silty Soils Using Dynamic Compaction and Stone Columns (No. MCEER-06-0009). Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.

Parvizi, M. (1999). Centrifuge modelling of low energy dynamic compaction(Doctoral dissertation, University of Manchester).

Lukas, R. G. (1986). Dynamic compaction for highway construction, volume 1: design and construction guidelines.

Feng, S. J., Tan, K., and Shui, W. H. (2013). Dynamic Compaction of Ultra-High Energy in Combination with Ground Replacement in Coastal Reclamation Areas. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology,

WWW.Simulia.com Visited at: 2014-08-17.

Mayne, P. W., Jones Jr, J. S., and Dumas, J. C. (1984). Ground response to dynamic compaction. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 110(6), 757-774.

Hamidi, B., Varaksin, S. and Nikraz, H.(2010). “Predicting Soil Parameters by Modelling Dynamic  Compaction Induced Subsidence’, 6th Australasian Congress on Applied Mechanics (ACAM6),  Perth, Australia, paper 1150.

Hamidi, B., Varaksin, S., and Nikraz, H. (2011). The application of dynamic compaction to HFO tanks. In International Conference on Advances in Geotechnical Engineering (ICAGE), Perth (pp. 7-9).

Hamidi, B., Nikraz, H., and Varaksin, S. (2010). Correlations between CPT and PMT at a Dynamic Compaction Project. In Proceedings of 2nd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, U.S.A

Leonards, G. A., Holtz, R. D., and Cutter, W. A. (1980). Dynamic compaction of granular soils. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 106(1), 35-44.

Al-Layla, M. T., and Al-Saffar, Q. N. (2014). Improving The Engineering Properties of The Gypseous Soil Using Dynamic Compaction Method. Al-Rafidain Engineering Journal, 22(2).

Thilakasiri, H. S., Gunaratne, M., Mullins, G., Stinnette, P., and Jory, B. (1996). Investigation of impact stresses induced in laboratory dynamic compaction of soft soils. International journal for numerical and analytical methods in geomechanics, 20(10), 753-767.

Nazhat, Y. N. Y. (2013). Behaviour of sandy soil subjected to dynamic loading. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Sydney.

     Jozef  Vlcek, Terezie Vondráčková(2016). Comparative Analysis of Dynamic Methods for Earthwork Controlling, Volume 161, Procedia Engineering,  2016, Pages 483-488.